The Migrating out of Poverty Research Programme Consortium
(RPC) is conducting research on internal and regional migration in Africa and
Asia. As part of our qualitative research we focus upon three areas of
employment that attract a lot of migrant workers in several different
countries. These are domestic work, construction work and manufacturing. The
assumption many of us made when we began to think about these categories is
that men work in construction and women in domestic work.
A conspicuous aspect of many cities in rapidly urbanising
and developing countries is a vibrant construction sector and the rapid
emergence of new buildings. Millions of workers work on construction projects
large and small in cities across the developing world. Often a very high
proportion of these workers are internal and regional migrants.
Along with my colleagues Priya Deshingkar and Bridget Holtom, I reviewed the literature on internal and regional migration for construction work to survey the current state of the evidence and identify themes and gaps in the literature. The review will soon be published by the RPC, here I report some of the results of this review of the literature for International Women’s Day.
Along with my colleagues Priya Deshingkar and Bridget Holtom, I reviewed the literature on internal and regional migration for construction work to survey the current state of the evidence and identify themes and gaps in the literature. The review will soon be published by the RPC, here I report some of the results of this review of the literature for International Women’s Day.
One of the first things that struck me was that among the
studies we found about internal and regional migration for construction work in
developing countries, very few explicitly look at gender relations and/or the
role of women. Those that do exist tend to be based in India and Bangladesh. We
speculate that this is because it is common to have women working in
construction in South Asia, but not in other parts of the world, our research
in African countries aims to see if this is true.
Research in India and Bangladesh on women working on
construction sites reveals interesting gendered divisions of labour and
inequalities in wages on construction sites as well as gendered patterns of
remittance sending. Many migrant women working in construction in Bangladesh
had migrated with their husbands or families, but a significant proportion
migrated alone or headed their household. They were mostly young (25-35), poor
and from rural areas. Women workers earned less than their male counterparts
and if they were alone had to pay more for their accommodation (Ahsan, 1997). Higher
status and skilled jobs (which offer the most potential for genuinely
transformational earning) are dominated by men (Pattenden 2012).
Poor health for women migrants and their families working on
construction sites are a major concern in the literature. Conditions on many
construction sites in developing countries are incredibly dangerous and social
protection is often minimal. Poor health can lead to increased indebtedness and
so reduce the positive outcomes of migration. Interestingly, Jatrana and
Sangwan, (2004) find that women construction workers in North India perceive
their own health to be better after migration, although poor health was a
constant aspect of their lives. For these women construction workers, being
relieved of water and firewood collection duties and having a constant supply
of food made them feel healthier. The costs of accessing high quality medical
attention were still prohibitive for them; so improved access to healthcare was
not the deciding factor. Jatrana and Sangwan attribute the improved perception
of health to urban lifestyles and social network support that the migrants come
into contact with in cities.
Emerging findings from our research in Ethiopia support this
interesting observation. While conditions for women migrant workers in the cities
of Ethiopia are hard at best and border on modern day slavery at worst, the conditions,
which many women and girls have migrated to leave behind, are even worse. As
Naila Kabeer (2000) described in her book on the garments industry in
Bangladesh, the options available for many poor women and girls other than the exploitative conditions
of work in the garments industry are very grim indeed.
Research on female migrants tends to portray them as
victims, to highlight their health problems and the exploitation they suffer,
without paying much attention to the exploitative or abusive conditions that
they have left behind and the contributions they make to their families’ and
nations’ development. Migrant women working in the construction industries of
developing countries shake the foundations of the way women migrants are socially constructed.
Benjamin Zeitlyn is the Theme Leader for Qualitative
Research within the Migrating out of Poverty Research Programme Consortium.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Would you like to respond to anything said by the author of this blog? Please leave comment below.