This adapted version of a blog by Kellynn
Wee was first published on the Migrating out of Poverty (Singapore) site and is
re-posted here to mark the start of the Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD) 2017.
Building
on an op-end I wrote with Kuda Vanyoro and
conversations with sharp, wonderful colleagues, these are my immediate
impressions of the GFMD 2016. (My experiences
stem from attending two sessions on labour recruitment and global supply
chains, another on migrant diasporas and entrepreneurship, and a final session
on developing a gender-sensitive approach to the Global Compact.)
We still tend to talk about
migrants as workers first, people second.
This is a thread
that runs powerfully through discussions pre-empting the Global Compact on
Migration, and was particularly evident on Common Space Day. We talked about
labour markets, push and pull factors, entrepreneurship, skills development and
matching, recruitment fee regulations, and how migrants brighten local
economies as a justification for their entrance into nation-states, employers,
ethical recruitment–all of which are crucial topics–but we talked less about
migrants’ changing family dynamics, socio-cultural incorporation and inclusion,
intimate relationships, and reproductive rights.
Women aren’t just domestic
workers.
This tends to be our default mode when we talk
about women in migration. Firstly, this reverts to point #1: we see women
migrants, first and foremost, as migrant workers. The second problem is that we
have fallen into a familiar narrative of adopting domestic workers as the
default ‘worker’, which in no way diminishes the urgency of the issues that
surround domestic work, but crowds the spaces that we have to discuss women in
labour migration. What about, for example, women who engage in embodied and
intimate labour, such as migrant sex workers? This is a trickier and more
divisive terrain to navigate, but important nonetheless. The third and
most pressing problem is that a gender-sensitive approach cannot and should not
be restricted to women as workers. Marriage migrants are a significant
migration flow: in Singapore, one
in five marriages are between a citizen and a foreign spouse. A
foreign wife’s legal status is dependent
on her husband and a rising number deals
with shocking levels of abuse. Or what about ‘study mamas‘, women who
accompany children who migrate to study abroad? We also did not discuss
transgender women and queer women, and the specific vulnerabilities that they
must grapple with. Will these women make an appearance in the upcoming Global Compact, or our future discussions about migration and women.
The host country plays a
powerful role in setting the agenda.
The candidness of H.E.
Shahidul Haque, the Bangladesh Foreign Secretary and this year’s GFMD Chair,
was a breath of fresh air. Playing both provocateur and realist, he was
forthcoming, reflexive about the mandate of states, and eager to urge civil
society to take a leading role in issues of migration in the years ahead. “How
about a free, fair, and responsive approach, rather than safe, regular and
orderly?” H.E. said at today’s Common Space speech. “The strength of every
movement is the people, not the state. Have you ever seen a state lead a
transformation?” he said at the GFMD Civil Society Days opening speech.
(It helps that he’s very quotable.) In comparison to last year, I thought
this year’s Common Space had a relaxed openness to it, with civil society
representatives and government delegates truly interacting, responding, and
mixing, not just in the interstices of the conference, but within the formal
spaces of the conferences as well.
Moderation and session
structures are critical to the quality of the discussions.
Well-moderated
discussions had several common elements: good timekeeping, critical in reining
overenthusiastic speakers in; reminding delegates to ask pointed, concise
questions; an ability to make thematic connections between disparate comments
and questions; and, most importantly, the facilitation of interaction, rather
than panellists’ monologues. In a room full of experts who have spent years
working closely with migrants, it is, I think, less important for
panellists to share statistics about rates of migrant abuse–an issue we can
safely assume to all be intimately familiar with–and more important for a
lively Q&A which will allow panellists and the floor to dynamically shape
their responses in relation to each other, and to better explore topics of
discussion.And in many ways, this year, they shone. Poet Vanessa Kisuule’s performances were a gift: necessary, honest, funny, piercing; they felt organic, not shoehorned or tacked on, and I appreciated her active participation and reflection in the days following her poetry. The photo exhibition at the foyer–titled ‘The Best Years of My Life‘ and put together by Shahidul Alam–tracked the lives of Bangladeshi migrants to Malaysia, and glowed with open empathy. Nonetheless, however, I echo the comment we made in our reflection on last year’s GFMD.
What is the role of research(ers) at the GFMD?
There are times where I itched, and tried, to temper abstract principles in empirical stories, data, and information. I think I talked often, for example, about how recruitment fee flows are gendered in Asia: women migrate through debt; men migrate through upfront fees. These have hugely different implications and will need different solutions. The perennial question of how to connect a global process to local contexts remains something that we will need to explore.
I am both optimistic and wary (and weary. Goodbye forever to
6 am wake-up times! I say fervently). It has been an exciting few days, with
many ups and downs, coloured with lots of frustrations and Twitter rants and furiously
whispered conversations with people at tea tables and in the audience, but also
with moments of delight and joy, and a conviction that some conversations are,
at last, moving forward and taking flight. Warm, warm congratulations to the
Bangladesh team for pulling off a fantastically organised conference on a
tremendous scale. Until we meet again.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Would you like to respond to anything said by the author of this blog? Please leave comment below.